Institute Home Business Roundtable Institute for Corporate Ethics Logo Business Roundtable Institute for Corporate Ethics Banner Spacer Darden Home Business Roundtable Home Institute Home
About the Business Roundtable Institute for Corporate Ethics Business Ethics Seminars Academic Advisors of the Business Roundtable Institute for Corporate Ethics Advisory Council of the Business Roundtable Institute for Corporate Ethics Business Ethics Publications Business Ethics Research Media Kit for the Business Roundtable Institute for Corporate Ethics Business Roundtable Institute for Corporate Ethics News Business Ethics Resources
spacer
 

Dean Krehmeyer
IROs Push to End Guidance

By Dean Krehmeyer

Investor relations officers are playing a significant role in decisions to end guidance at firms. In a recent survey, National Investor Relations Institute (NIRI) studied companies that recently discontinued financial guidance. NIRI found that 28% of the decisions to discontinue financial guidance stemmed from the IRO.

The list of organizations calling for companies to discontinue earnings guidance keeps growing. As a co-author of a report on ending short-termism in the marketplace, I am among those voices in the “stop guidance” chorus.

Good News/Bad News
Academic research shows that guidance may actually lead to value destructive behaviors and actions. For example, Sarbanes-Oxley has resulted in a good news/bad news story. The Sarbanes-Oxley requirement that the CEO and CFO sign and authorize corporate financial statements may be having the desired effect of reducing the willingness of companies to utilize accounting tricks, such as reserve adjustments, to meet quarterly earnings estimates.

However, the bad news is that more companies are engaging in real actions—not just accounting tricks—to meet earnings projections. In July 2006, New York Times Columnist Joe Nocera wrote a story on Campbell Harvey, a Duke University professor who conducted a study on the effects of short-term thinking.

Professor Harvey concluded that companies “are doing things that effect the real operations of the company, like postponing R&D. And things like R&D create real value in the long term.”

Need to Focus on Value, Not Numbers
Value creation is the basis of what makes business a moral and a profitable enterprise. Ending the guidance game creates an opportunity for the company and the IRO to create value and provide more and better information to stakeholders.

Candace Browning, Head of Global Securities research at Merrill Lynch & Co. testified before Congress that focused earnings guidance “dictates an outcome [that] cannot possibly convey the subtle forces that shape a wise…decision.”

Her recommendation: Companies should provide investors with information “on long-terms goals or targets such as reducing costs, increasing market share, growing capacity, and improving return on equity.”

Again, this helps to focus attention on the strategic value-creating purpose of the firm, instead of on an arbitrary number.

---------

Dean Krehmeyer is Executive Director of the Business Roundtable Institute for Corporate Ethics. He can be reached at director@corporate-ethics.org.

This article originally appeared in the November, 2007 issue  of the Investor Relations Newsletter (http://www.ioma.com/issues/INVRN/) where Mr. Krehmeyer authors a quarterly column on corporate ethics. It is republished here with permission.
 

 

   

Hits and Misses

     

The Wall Street Journal reports that more than 66% of companies are able to “beat” their quarterly guidance while only about 10% “miss.” There may be several explanations, but many analysts believe that most companies understate guidance.

 

Copyright © 2005 Business Roundtable Institute for Corporate Ethics
Questions?  Contact Brian Moriarty